Chapter 1
General Provisions, Administration, Definitions, and Measurement
What the ordinance is, how it is administered, who decides, what terms mean, how things are measured. Definitions and measurement rules consolidated and placed early.
11-1-1Title
This ordinance is the Helena Unified Development Ordinance and may be cited as the 'UDO.'
11-1-2AuthorityNoteThe second sentence is the reason the citation cleanup matters: 76-25-105(4) provides that a jurisdiction operating under chapter 25 is not subject to chapter 3 at all, so the half-migrated 76-3 citations in the current Title 12 point at superseded authority.
This UDO is adopted under the authority of Title 76, chapter 25, MCA, the Montana Land Use Planning Act, including part 3 (zoning regulations, 76-25-301 et seq.) and part 4 (subdivision regulations, 76-25-401 et seq.), and other applicable Montana law. As provided in 76-25-105(4), a local government that complies with Title 76, chapter 25 is not subject to Title 76, chapters 1, 2, 3, or 8.
11-1-3Purpose
The purpose of this UDO is to implement the Helena Forward Land Use Plan through unified zoning and subdivision regulations that: (A) regulate the use, density, type, form, and mass of development and establish development standards that mitigate the impacts of development, consistent with 76-25-301(2); (B) regulate the division of land into lots, blocks, streets, and public ways, consistent with 76-25-401 and 76-25-404; (C) provide for sufficient housing units, attainable for residents of all income levels, consistent with the purpose stated in 76-25-102(2)(a); (D) support compatible mixed-use, employment, and neighborhood-scale areas; (E) protect public health and safety and reduce conflicts between incompatible uses; (F) protect natural resources, the natural environment, historic resources, and civic and cultural assets, and avoid or minimize the dangers associated with natural hazards, consistent with 76-25-301(6) and (7); (G) improve the relationship between private development and the public realm, particularly the public right-of-way; and (H) provide development review procedures that are clear, predictable, and consistent with Title 76, chapter 25, including the streamlined administrative review of site-specific development applications contemplated by 76-25-102(3)(d).
11-1-4Applicability
This UDO applies to all land, buildings, structures, uses, and divisions of land within the corporate limits of the City of Helena.
This UDO also applies within the City's jurisdictional area as defined in 76-25-103(17), to the extent and in the manner provided by Title 76, chapter 25 and by Section 11-1-5.
No building or structure may be erected, moved, reconstructed, extended, or structurally altered, no land may be used, and no land may be divided, except in compliance with this UDO.
11-1-5JurisdictionNote76-25-301(1)(c) is explicit: the City must adopt zoning for its 20-year annexation area, but that zoning does not operate outside City limits until annexation. 76-25-305(2) supplies the rule for which jurisdiction reviews what, including the split-jurisdiction case. 76-25-306 ties annexation review to the 76-25-305 process and provides that the joint process satisfies the Title 7 annexation notice and hearing requirements.
Zoning jurisdiction. The zoning provisions of this UDO apply within the corporate limits of the City. The City adopts zoning regulations for the portions of its jurisdictional area outside the corporate limits that the City anticipates may be annexed over the next 20 years, as required by 76-25-301(1)(c)(i); under 76-25-301(1)(c)(ii), those regulations do not apply or take effect outside the corporate limits until the affected area is annexed or is being annexed.
Subdivision jurisdiction. The subdivision provisions of this UDO apply within the corporate limits of the City and within the City's jurisdictional area as provided by 76-25-401 and 76-25-405. Where a proposed subdivision lies partly within the corporate limits, the application is submitted to and approved by both the City and Lewis and Clark County, as provided in 76-25-305(2)(d).
Coordination with Lewis and Clark County. Determination of the reviewing jurisdiction for a development application follows 76-25-305(2): a development entirely within the City, or proposed for annexation, is reviewed by the City; a development within an area subject to increased growth pressures or other urban development influences identified under 76-25-213 is reviewed with the opportunity for other impacted jurisdictions to review and comment, as provided in 76-25-305(2)(c).
Prezoning. Territory proposed for annexation is prezoned through the zoning map amendment procedure in Chapter 3. A prezoning designation takes effect upon annexation. The City reviews a proposed annexation in conjunction with the prezoning, following the procedures of 76-25-305, as provided in 76-25-306.
11-1-6Relationship to the Helena Forward Land Use PlanNote76-25-216 makes the land use plan expressly non-regulatory; the regulations carry the binding authority. 76-25-304(6) supplies the adoption presumption that underlies the administrative-review posture — a substantially-compliant application is not re-litigated. Subsection D points to 76-25-214 as the statutory home for area and neighborhood plans that carry character categories rather than binding standards.
This UDO is the operative implementation of the Helena Forward Land Use Plan. Under 76-25-216, the land use plan and future land use map are not regulatory documents; this UDO is the regulation that implements the plan. Where this UDO's standards calibrate the implementation of plan policy, those standards are binding regulations.
Under 76-25-102(3) and 76-25-304(6), once a zoning regulation or map has been adopted in substantial compliance with the land use plan, there is a presumption that permitting in substantial compliance with that regulation or map is in substantial compliance with the land use plan and that the public has had a meaningful opportunity to participate.
Where the future land use map and the Official Zoning Map differ for a parcel, the Official Zoning Map controls for purposes of administering this UDO. The discrepancy may be resolved through a zoning map amendment under Chapter 3.
Planning categories that describe character or suggest future direction but do not carry defined regulatory standards — including place types — belong in the land use plan or in future area plans or neighborhood plans adopted under 76-25-214, not in this UDO.
11-1-7Official Zoning MapNote76-25-301(4) directs the City to adopt 'a zoning map' — singular — in substantial compliance with the land use plan. A single Official Zoning Map with internal layers follows that language. Subsection D's adopted-record-controls rule prevents a GIS or display error from becoming an entitlement dispute.
Adoption. The City is divided into zoning districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map. The Official Zoning Map, together with all amendments, is adopted by reference and is part of this UDO. The City adopts and maintains the Official Zoning Map in substantial compliance with the land use plan and future land use map, as required by 76-25-301(4).
Map layers. The Official Zoning Map is a single map containing the following layers
Zoning district — the zoning district applicable to each parcel
The A-grid and B-grid — the thoroughfare network designation described in Section 11-1-8 and calibrated by Chapter 4
Overlays — the overlay designations adopted under the consolidated overlay chapter.
Maintenance. The Official Zoning Map is maintained in the office of the City Clerk and the Community Development Department. The current Official Zoning Map and all adopted amendments are also made available through the City's online mapping platform.
Adopted record controls. Where an online map layer, a printed map, or a staff display conflicts with the adopted Official Zoning Map record, the adopted record controls.
11-1-8Regulatory frameworkNoteEvery layer of the regulatory framework corresponds to a binding standard tied to a defensible basis. The A-grid and B-grid is a network designation, not an honor roll of favored streets; every thoroughfare is on one grid or the other, and the B-grid is an actual designation that grants relief rather than the absence of a designation. Categories that describe character but carry no defined binding standard do planning work, not zoning work, and live in the land use plan — see Section 11-1-6(D).
This UDO regulates development through three layers, in order from most general to most specific
Citywide standards applicable to all zoning districts, including the site design standards in Chapter 4 and the use-specific operational standards in Section 11-2-9
Zoning district family and intensity — the RMX, CMX, IMX, and SP designations on the Official Zoning Map (Chapter 2)
Overlay districts and the A-grid and B-grid — mapped designations on the Official Zoning Map that add stricter calibration or alternative standards in specific geographic conditions. Overlay districts are established in Chapter 7. The A-grid and B-grid is established under subsection B and operates under Chapter 4.
The A-grid and B-grid. The A-grid and B-grid is a thoroughfare network shown on the Official Zoning Map. Every street is on either the A-grid or the B-grid. Building form standards in Chapter 4 are calibrated more strictly along A-grid frontages, where the continuity and quality of the public realm carry the most weight; B-grid frontages receive defined relief from certain A-grid form standards. The A-grid is established by analysis of the thoroughfare network and adopted on the Official Zoning Map; it is a network finding, not a list of individually selected streets. Criteria for A-grid membership and the procedure for amending the grid are provided in Chapter 4 and Chapter 3 respectively.
Standards in a more specific layer supersede standards in a more general layer, except where a citywide standard expressly applies notwithstanding the more specific layer.
11-1-9AdministrationNoteThe set of decision-makers is limited to those Title 76, chapter 25 establishes for land-use decisions: the Planning Administrator (76-25-103(27)), the Planning Commission (76-25-104, with its appeal role at 76-25-104(3)(b) and 76-25-503), and the governing body. The City Engineer is not codified in this Title; the Engineer's authority lives elsewhere in City Code, and the UDO's subdivision design menus are drafted to be consistent with the Engineering and Design Standards and the fire code without restating them.
Planning Administrator. The Planning Administrator is the Director of the Community Development Department or the Director's designee, consistent with the definition of 'planning administrator' in 76-25-103(27). The Planning Administrator administers this UDO, including: receiving and reviewing applications; making completeness determinations; making the substantial-compliance and impact determinations required by 76-25-305; issuing ministerial permits and other administrative decisions under Chapter 3 and the relief chapter; issuing written interpretations under Section 11-1-11; providing technical assistance and recommendations to applicants, the public, the Planning Commission, and the governing body; and enforcing this UDO.
Planning Commission. The Planning Commission is the body established by the City under 76-25-104. As provided in 76-25-104(3), the Planning Commission reviews and makes recommendations to the governing body on the land use plan, zoning regulations and map, subdivision regulations, and other legislative land use documents, and hears and decides appeals of site-specific land use decisions of the Planning Administrator de novo under 76-25-503. The ordinance or resolution establishing the Planning Commission sets its membership, terms, officers, and procedures, consistent with 76-25-104(2).
Governing body. The governing body is the City Commission. The governing body adopts and amends the land use plan, the zoning regulations and map, and the subdivision regulations under 76-25-201, 76-25-304, and 76-25-403; hears second-tier appeals de novo under 76-25-503(4); and approves final plats, except where this UDO and Montana law provide for administrative final plat approval of an administrative minor subdivision.
Engineering and fire-code review. This UDO does not assign or describe the authority of the City Engineer or the fire authority. That authority is established elsewhere in City Code and in Montana law. Where a provision of this UDO — particularly a subdivision design standard in Chapter 5 — addresses a subject for which the City's Engineering and Design Standards or the applicable fire code set construction or safety requirements, the UDO provision is drafted to be consistent with, and not to conflict with, those requirements. The construction and safety determinations themselves are made under the authority and procedures established for them outside this Title.
11-1-10Rules of constructionNoteSubsection F: Chapter 4 carries calibration tables and form figures; the text-controls rule keeps an illustration from being read as a standard.
Ordinary meaning. Words and phrases used in this UDO have their ordinary meaning unless defined in Section 11-1-12 or in a specific chapter. Where a term is not defined in this UDO, it has its ordinary accepted meaning within the context in which it is used.
Tense, number, gender. Words used in the present tense include the future. The singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. The masculine includes the feminine and neuter.
Mandatory and permissive. 'Shall' and 'must' are mandatory. 'May' is permissive. 'Should' is advisory, not mandatory.
Conjunctions. 'And' indicates that all connected provisions apply. 'Or' indicates that the connected provisions may apply singularly or in combination.
Lists and examples. 'Including' and 'such as' introduce examples and are not exhaustive.
Headings and illustrations. Headings, figures, tables, and illustrations are provided for convenience. Where the text of this UDO and a heading, figure, table, or illustration differ in meaning, the text controls.
Current citations. References to other City, county, state, or federal regulations refer to the most current version unless expressly stated otherwise.
Conflict with state law. Where a provision of this UDO conflicts with a mandatory requirement of Title 76, chapter 25, MCA, the statute controls.
11-1-11Rules of interpretationNoteSubsection A's 'more specific controls' default replaces the current code's 'more restrictive controls' default — form standards do not sort cleanly on a restrictiveness scale, and a build-to range is not more or less restrictive than a setback minimum. Subsection D is the verified command of 76-25-301(8)(b) and (9), which direct that ambiguities be read in favor of the use.
More specific standard controls. Where standards of this UDO conflict, the more specific standard controls unless expressly stated otherwise.
Order of specificity. From most specific to most general
an airport safety, hazard, life-safety, or other standard required by state or federal law
an overlay or Special Purpose district standard
a A-grid and B-grid standard adopted under Chapter 4
a base zoning district standard
a general citywide standard.
Ambiguity. Where a standard of this UDO is ambiguous as applied to a particular parcel or application, the Planning Administrator issues a written interpretation. Written interpretations are recorded, made available for public reference, and may be appealed under Chapter 3 as an interpretation of land use regulations, consistent with 76-25-503(3)(a).
Interpretation favoring the use. Consistent with 76-25-301(8)(b) and 76-25-301(9), an ambiguity or uncertainty as to whether a nonconforming use is allowed, or whether a use was allowed when commenced, and an ambiguity or uncertainty as to whether a use violates this UDO, are interpreted in favor of the use.
Relationship to the Engineering and Design Standards. Where this UDO states form intent or a review trigger for a subject for which the City's Engineering and Design Standards specify construction detail, the UDO provision and the Engineering and Design Standards are read together: the UDO governs the land-use and form question, and the Engineering and Design Standards govern the construction question. Neither restates the other.
11-1-12DefinitionsNoteThe current code's defined terms are scattered across ten chapter-specific sections — 11-4-1, 11-6-2, 11-7-2, 11-8-2, 11-9-2, 11-23-2, 11-24-2, 11-35-1, 11-38-2, 11-40-2 — plus the current Title 12 definitions, with no general list anywhere. Consolidating here mirrors how Title 76, chapter 25 front-loads its own definitions at 76-25-103. Terms that do specialized work in one chapter — sign area and sign height are the examples — stay in that chapter. Consolidation is not flattening.
Application. This Section is the consolidated definitions Section for this UDO. Terms defined here apply throughout this UDO unless a specific chapter expressly provides a different definition limited to that chapter.
Chapter-scoped terms. Certain operational terms are used only within a single chapter and do different regulatory work than their general counterparts. Those terms are defined in the chapter that uses them, and the principal ones are noted in this Section so the boundary is explicit.
Statutory terms. Terms defined by Title 76, chapter 25, MCA carry their statutory meaning. Where this Section lists such a term, the statutory definition controls and the entry cites the section.
Definitions.
Definitions drafting notes
{'scope_of_this_pass': "This is a substantial first consolidation, corrected against the verified text of Title 76, chapter 25. It captures: the statutory vocabulary the UDO must use (the terms 76-25-103 defines, plus 'variance' from 76-25-502 and 'substantial compliance' as it operates through 76-25-305); the general dimensional terms from current 11-4-1; the nonconformity terms from 11-6-2; the new form-based vocabulary the rewrite requires; the subdivision terms from current Title 12; and the boundary-marking entries that record what stays chapter-scoped. The full Signs chapter vocabulary (dozens of terms), the full Mobile Home Parks and RV Parks operational terms, the Daycare terms, the Alcohol/Casino terms, the Landscaping terms, and the Airport terms are deliberately not pulled into this consolidated list — they are chapter-scoped operational vocabulary and stay in their chapters.", 'statutory_vocabulary_note': "A defining feature of this corrected pass is that roughly two dozen entries are tagged 'statutory.' Title 76, chapter 25 defines its own working vocabulary at 76-25-103, plus 'variance' at 76-25-502. Where the UDO uses those terms it adopts the statutory meaning rather than writing its own — this is both legally required and the cleanest way to keep the ordinance aligned with the statute as the statute is amended. The coordinated dwelling-type family (single-unit, two-unit, three-unit, four-unit, multi-unit dwelling) is entirely statutory and the Chapter 2 use tables are built on it.", 'what_a_later_pass_still_needs': "Confirm each chapter-scoped definition set against its rewritten chapter; reconcile the current 11-7-2 'mobile home' definition against the statutory distinction between 'mobile home' and 'manufactured housing' and the 76-25-303(1)(a) protection of manufactured housing; add new defined terms as Chapters 2 through 6 are drafted (the use-table categories, the supplemental use standard terms, the Chapter 4 frontage-type operational definitions, the Chapter 5 connectivity terms); and reconcile the Daycare chapter terms against the childcare supplemental use standard and against 76-25-303(1)(f)(iii) and (g), which limit how the UDO may treat registered family and group day-care homes.", 'conflict_flags_summary': "Four resolved conflicts are recorded in the entries: building height (Downtown vs. citywide — the conflict the City already began cleaning up in Phase 1), lot (general vs. RV-park), lot line / property line (split across four sections), and nonconforming use/structure (general vs. airport). Each is resolved by consolidating the general definition here and, where the chapter-scoped meaning does genuinely different work, leaving it in its chapter. A fifth item is flagged but not yet resolved: the current 'mobile home' definition versus the statutory 'manufactured housing' / 'mobile home' distinction — that reconciliation is a later-pass task because it depends on how the Mobile Home Parks chapter is rewritten."}
11-1-13Measurement rulesNoteSubsection H: sign area and sign height are measured by the Signs section's conventions in Chapter 4. Measuring a sign is its own matter with its own conventions.
Application. This Section states how the standards of this UDO are measured. Measurement rules apply throughout this UDO unless a specific chapter expressly provides a different measurement rule limited to that chapter.
Building height. Building height is measured as provided in the definition of 'building height' in Section 11-1-12.
Lot coverage. Lot coverage is measured as provided in the definition of 'lot coverage' in Section 11-1-12.
Setbacks and build-to zones. [DRAFTING NOTE: measurement rule for how a setback distance and a build-to range are measured — from which lot line, from back of sidewalk, to which point of the building. Coordinates with Chapter 4.] E. Frontage occupancy. Frontage occupancy is measured as the percentage of the length of a frontage occupied by building wall or by an approved frontage element. [DRAFTING NOTE: the list of approved frontage elements and how each is measured along the frontage — coordinates with Chapter 4.] F. Transparency. Transparency is measured by story, as the percentage of the area of a facade wall segment composed of clear, transparent windows or openings. [DRAFTING NOTE: the measured area boundaries — coordinates with Chapter 4.] G. Lot dimensions. [DRAFTING NOTE: how lot width, lot depth, and lot area are measured, including for irregular and corner lots and for lots fronting a curve — coordinates with Chapter 5 lot standards.] H. Chapter-specific measurement. Where a chapter regulates a quantity that is measured differently than the rules in this Section — including the measurement of sign area and sign height under the Signs chapter — the measurement rule in that chapter governs for that chapter's purposes.
11-1-14Relationship to other regulationsNoteSubsection B states the form/engineering seam as a drafting constraint, consistent with Section 11-1-9(D). The UDO is not subordinate to the Engineering and Design Standards and the Engineering and Design Standards are not subordinate to the UDO; they do different jobs.
This UDO is the City's unified zoning and subdivision ordinance. Other regulations affecting development in the City include, without limitation, the City's Engineering and Design Standards, the applicable building and fire codes, applicable floodplain regulations under Title 76, chapter 5, MCA, and applicable historic preservation provisions.
Engineering and Design Standards. The City's Engineering and Design Standards are an external document, administered outside this Title, that specifies construction detail for streets, utilities, stormwater, and related infrastructure. This UDO states land-use and form intent and review triggers; the Engineering and Design Standards specify construction detail. The two are coordinated by cross-reference and are read together as provided in Section 11-1-11.E. The subdivision design provisions of this UDO are drafted to be consistent with the Engineering and Design Standards and the applicable fire code and not to conflict with them. This UDO does not restate, renumber, or supersede the Engineering and Design Standards.
Fire code and life safety. Where the applicable fire code sets a requirement bearing on site or subdivision design — including fire apparatus access and turnaround requirements — the subdivision and site design provisions of this UDO are drafted to be consistent with that requirement. The fire-code determinations themselves are made under the authority established for them outside this Title.
Cross-references to other regulations appear in specific chapters of this UDO where coordination is necessary. The absence of a cross-reference does not imply that other regulations do not apply.
11-1-15Severability
If any provision of this UDO, or its application to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this UDO and the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances are not affected.
11-1-16FeesNote76-25-501 expressly authorizes reasonable fees for zoning permits, subdivision applications, appeals, and other reviews. The second sentence states the fee-payment-triggers-review rule that Helena's adopted process documents already apply: an application is not considered submitted until the fee is paid.
Fees for applications, permits, appeals, and other reviews under this UDO are established by resolution of the City Commission, consistent with the authority in 76-25-501 to establish reasonable fees to defray the expense of performing the review. An application is not complete, and applicable review timelines do not begin, until the required fee is paid.
11-1-17Enforcement and violationsNoteThis section is drawn to 76-25-504, the verified enforcement section. 76-25-504(2) sets the notice-and-opportunity-to-cure sequence the City must follow before civil penalties; 76-25-504(3) supplies the remedies, including the misdemeanor provision.
Enforcement. The Planning Administrator enforces this UDO.
Civil penalties and remedies. The City may establish and impose civil penalties for violations of this UDO by ordinance, as authorized by 76-25-504. Before seeking civil penalties against a property owner, the City provides written notice of each violation to the owner of record, a reasonable opportunity to cure, and a schedule of the civil penalties that may be imposed for failure to cure, as required by 76-25-504(2).
Additional remedies. In addition to other remedies provided by law, the City may seek an injunction, mandamus, abatement, or other appropriate action; proceedings to prevent, enjoin, abate, or remove an unlawful building, use, occupancy, or act; or criminal prosecution as a misdemeanor as provided in 76-25-504(3). Each day a violation continues is a separate offense.
Remedies are cumulative. The City's pursuit of one remedy does not preclude pursuit of others.
11-1-18Transition
Transition is handled by the ordinance adopting this UDO. An application received before the adoption date is reviewed under the regulations in effect when it was received; an application received on or after the adoption date is reviewed under this UDO. The adopting ordinance also addresses renumbering and cross-reference cleanup, the conversion of parcels from the prior zoning districts to their successor zoning districts, and the treatment of existing Planned Unit Developments and existing T district parcels under the retired PUD and T district provisions.
Open items for this chapter (7)
- Section 11-1-12: the consolidated definitions list is a substantial first pass corrected against verified Title 76, chapter 25 text — not exhaustive. Chapter-scoped sets are confirmed against their rewritten chapters in a later pass; new terms are added as Chapters 2-6 are drafted.
- Section 11-1-12: the current 11-7-2 'mobile home' definition must be reconciled against the statutory distinction between 'mobile home' and 'manufactured housing' (76-25-103(23)) and the 76-25-303(1)(a) protection of manufactured housing — a later-pass task tied to the Mobile Home Parks chapter rewrite.
- Section 11-1-13: the actual measurement methods for setbacks/build-to, frontage occupancy, transparency, and lot dimensions are drafted as Chapters 4 and 5 are drafted.
- Section 11-1-8 and Chapters 3-4: the A-grid and B-grid needs its membership criteria (Chapter 4) and its amendment procedure (Chapter 3) drafted. Section 11-1-8 establishes the concept and cross-references both.
- Working-file coordination: the dual subdivision appeal track must be carried into the Chapter 3 procedures and the crosswalk — the 76-25-503 two-tier de novo path for most decisions, and the separate 76-3-609 path Helena currently uses for administrative minor subdivisions (appeal to the City Commission via the City Manager, arbitrary/capricious standard). Note this 76-3-609 path coexists with the 76-25-105(4) point that chapter 3 generally no longer applies — the administrative-minor-subdivision appeal is a specific retained mechanism and should be confirmed and explained, not assumed away.
- Working-file coordination: 76-25-303 (the Effective October 1, 2026 version) limits parking requirements — one space maximum per dwelling unit and no minimum for several categories — and limits height restrictions and the treatment of certain housing and care facilities. This is a Chapter 2 and Parking-chapter constraint; it should be captured in the working file's legal_and_implementation_assumptions or policy_risks so the use tables and parking standards are drawn to it.
- Working-file coordination: RISK-CUP in the working file should be softened. The verified picture is that Helena's adopted April 2026 CUP process already operates the conditional use permit as a chapter-25-conformant ministerial process; the residual risk is the narrower drafting task of expressing the 11-3-4(B) criteria as objective standards, not the existential question of whether the CUP survives.